The Self-Appointed Altruists

Their arrival portends rising local prices and a culturethird-world factory wages, backed up by trade
shock. Many of them live in plush apartments, or fivebarriers to keep out imports from countries that do
star hotels, drive SUV's, sport $3000 laptops andnot comply. Shoppers in the West pay more - but
PDA's. They earn a two figure multiple of the localwillingly, because they know it is in a good cause. The
average wage. They are busybodies, preachers,NGOs declare another victory. The companies, having
critics, do-gooders, and professional altruists.Alwaysshafted their third-world competition and protected
self-appointed, they answer to no constituency.their domestic markets, count their bigger profits
Though unelected and ignorant of local realities, they(higher wage costs notwithstanding). And the
confront the democratically chosen and those whothird-world workers displaced from locally owned
voted them into office. A few of them arefactories explain to their children why the West's
enmeshed in crime and corruption. They are thenew deal for the victims of capitalism requires them
non-governmental organizations, or NGO's.Someto starve."NGO's in places like Sudan, Somalia,
NGO's - like Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, MedecinsMyanmar, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Albania, and
Sans Frontieres, or Amnesty - genuinely contribute toZimbabwe have become the preferred venue for
enhancing welfare, to the mitigation of hunger, theWestern aid - both humanitarian and financial -
furtherance of human and civil rights, or the curbingdevelopment financing, and emergency relief.
of disease. Others - usually in the guise of think tanksAccording to the Red Cross, more money goes
and lobby groups - are sometimes ideologically biased,through NGO's than through the World Bank. Their
or religiously-committed and, often, at the service ofiron grip on food, medicine, and funds rendered them
special interests.NGO's - such as the Internationalan alternative government - sometimes as venal and
Crisis Group - have openly interfered on behalf of thegraft-stricken as the one they replace.Local
opposition in the recent elections in Macedonia. Otherbusinessmen, politicians, academics, and even
NGO's have done so in Belarus and Ukraine,journalists form NGO's to plug into the avalanche of
Zimbabwe and Israel, Nigeria and Thailand, SlovakiaWestern largesse. In the process, they award
and Hungary - and even in Western, rich, countriesthemselves and their relatives with salaries, perks,
including the USA, Canada, Germany, and Belgium.Theand preferred access to Western goods and credits.
encroachment on state sovereignty of internationalNGO's have evolved into vast networks of
law - enshrined in numerous treaties and conventionspatronage in Africa, Latin America, and Asia.NGO's
- allows NGO's to get involved in hitherto strictlychase disasters with a relish. More than 200 of them
domestic affairs like corruption, civil rights, theopened shop in the aftermath of the Kosovo
composition of the media, the penal and civil codes,refugee crisis in 1999-2000. Another 50 supplanted
environmental policies, or the allocation of economicthem during the civil unrest in Macedonia a year later.
resources and of natural endowments, such as landFloods, elections, earthquakes, wars - constitute the
and water. No field of government activity is nowcornucopia that feed the NGO's.NGO's are proponents
exempt from the glare of NGO's. They serve asof Western values - women's lib, human rights, civil
self-appointed witnesses, judges, jury andrights, the protection of minorities, freedom, equality.
executioner rolled into one.Regardless of theirNot everyone finds this liberal menu palatable. The
persuasion or modus operandi, all NGO's are toparrival of NGO's often provokes social polarization and
heavy with entrenched, well-remunerated,cultural clashes. Traditionalists in Bangladesh,
extravagantly-perked bureaucracies. Opacity is typicalnationalists in Macedonia, religious zealots in Israel,
of NGO's. Amnesty's rules prevent its officials fromsecurity forces everywhere, and almost all politicians
publicly discussing the inner workings of thefind NGO's irritating and bothersome.The British
organization - proposals, debates, opinions - until theygovernment ploughs well over $30 million a year into
have become officially voted into its Mandate. Thus,"Proshika", a Bangladeshi NGO. It started as a
dissenting views rarely get an open hearing.Contrarywomen's education outfit and ended up as a restive
to their teachings, the financing of NGO's is invariablyand aggressive women empowerment political lobby
obscure and their sponsors unknown. The bulk of thegroup with budgets to rival many ministries in this
income of most non-governmental organizations,impoverished, Moslem and patriarchal country.Other
even the largest ones, comes from - usually foreign -NGO's - fuelled by $300 million of annual foreign
powers. Many NGO's serve as official contractors forinfusion - evolved from humble origins to become
governments.NGO's serve as long arms of theirmighty coalitions of full-time activists. NGO's like the
sponsoring states - gathering intelligence, burnishingBangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC)
their image, and promoting their interests. There is aand the Association for Social Advancement
revolving door between the staff of NGO's andmushroomed even as their agendas have been fully
government bureaucracies the world over. The Britishimplemented and their goals exceeded. It now owns
Foreign Office finances a host of NGO's - includingand operates 30,000 schools.This mission creep is not
the fiercely "independent" Global Witness - in troubledunique to developing countries. As Parkinson
spots, such as Angola. Many host governmentsdiscerned, organizations tend to self-perpetuate
accuse NGO's of - unwittingly or knowingly - servingregardless of their proclaimed charter. Remember
as hotbeds of espionage.Very few NGO's deriveNATO? Human rights organizations, like Amnesty, are
some of their income from public contributions andnow attempting to incorporate in their
donations. The more substantial NGO's spend oneever-expanding remit "economic and social rights" -
tenth of their budget on PR and solicitation of charity.such as the rights to food, housing, fair wages,
In a desperate bid to attract international attention,potable water, sanitation, and health provision. How
so many of them lied about their projects in theinsolvent countries are supposed to provide such
Rwanda crisis in 1994, recounts "The Economist", thatmunificence is conveniently overlooked."The
the Red Cross felt compelled to draw up a ten pointEconomist" reviewed a few of the more egregious
mandatory NGO code of ethics. A code of conductcases of NGO imperialism.Human Rights Watch lately
was adopted in 1995. But the phenomenon recurredoffered this tortured argument in favor of expanding
in Kosovo.All NGO's claim to be not for profit - yet,the role of human rights NGO's: "The best way to
many of them possess sizable equity portfolios andprevent famine today is to secure the right to free
abuse their position to increase the market share ofexpression - so that misguided government policies
firms they own. Conflicts of interest and unethicalcan be brought to public attention and corrected
behavior abound.Cafedirect is a British firm committedbefore food shortages become acute." It blatantly
to "fair trade" coffee. Oxfam, an NGO, embarked onignored the fact that respect for human and political
a campaign targeted at Cafedirect's competitors,rights does not fend off natural disasters and disease.
accusing them of exploiting growers by paying themThe two countries with the highest incidence of
a tiny fraction of the retail price of the coffee theyAIDS are Africa's only two true democracies -
sell. Yet, Oxfam owns 25% of Cafedirect.LargeBotswana and South Africa.The Centre for Economic
NGO's resemble multinational corporations in structureand Social Rights, an American outfit, "challenges
and operation. They are hierarchical, maintain largeeconomic injustice as a violation of international
media, government lobbying, and PR departments,human rights law". Oxfam pledges to support the
head-hunt, invest proceeds in professionally-managed"rights to a sustainable livelihood, and the rights and
portfolios, compete in government tenders, and owncapacities to participate in societies and make positive
a variety of unrelated businesses. The Aga Khanchanges to people's lives". In a poor attempt at
Fund for Economic Development owns the license foremulation, the WHO published an inanely titled
second mobile phone operator in Afghanistan -document - "A Human Rights Approach to
among other businesses. In this respect, NGO's areTuberculosis".NGO's are becoming not only
more like cults than like civic organizations.Many NGO'sall-pervasive but more aggressive. In their capacity as
promote economic causes - anti-globalization, the"shareholder activists", they disrupt shareholders
banning of child labor, the relaxing of intellectualmeetings and act to actively tarnish corporate and
property rights, or fair payment for agriculturalindividual reputations. Friends of the Earth worked
products. Many of these causes are both worthy andhard last year to instigate a consumer boycott
sound. Alas, most NGO's lack economic expertise andagainst Exxon Mobil - for not investing in renewable
inflict damage on the alleged recipients of theirenergy resources and for ignoring global warming. No
beneficence. NGO's are at times manipulated by - orone - including other shareholders - understood their
collude with - industrial groups and political parties.It isdemands. But it went down well with the media, with
telling that the denizens of many developing countriesa few celebrities, and with contributors.As "think
suspect the West and its NGO's of promoting antanks", NGO's issue partisan and biased reports. The
agenda of trade protectionism. Stringent - andInternational Crisis Group published a rabid attack on
expensive - labor and environmental provisions inthe then incumbent government of Macedonia, days
international treaties may well be a ploy to fend offbefore an election, relegating the rampant corruption
imports based on cheap labor and the competitionof its predecessors - whom it seemed to be tacitly
they wreak on well-ensconced domestic industriessupporting - to a few footnotes. On at least two
and their political stooges.Take child labor - as distinctoccasions - in its reports regarding Bosnia and
from the universally condemnable phenomena of childZimbabwe - ICG has recommended confrontation,
prostitution, child soldiering, or child slavery.Child labor,the imposition of sanctions, and, if all else fails, the
in many destitute locales, is all that separates theuse of force. Though the most vocal and visible, it is
family from all-pervasive, life threatening, poverty. Asfar from being the only NGO that advocates "just"
national income grows, child labor declines. Followingwars.The ICG is a repository of former heads of
the outcry provoked, in 1995, by NGO's againststate and has-been politicians and is renowned (and
soccer balls stitched by children in Pakistan, both Nikenotorious) for its prescriptive - some say
and Reebok relocated their workshops and sackedmeddlesome - philosophy and tactics. "The
countless women and 7000 children. The averageEconomist" remarked sardonically: "To say (that ICG)
family income - anyhow meager - fell by 20is 'solving world crises' is to risk underestimating its
percent.This affair elicited the following wryambitions, if overestimating its achievements."NGO's
commentary from economists Drusilla Brown, Alanhave orchestrated the violent showdown during the
Deardorif, and Robert Stern:"While Baden Sports cantrade talks in Seattle in 1999 and its repeat
quite credibly claim that their soccer balls are notperformances throughout the world. The World Bank
sewn by children, the relocation of their productionwas so intimidated by the riotous invasion of its
facility undoubtedly did nothing for their former childpremises in the NGO-choreographed "Fifty Years is
workers and their families."This is far from being aEnough" campaign of 1994, that it now employs
unique case. Threatened with legal reprisals anddozens of NGO activists and let NGO's determine
"reputation risks" (being named-and-shamed bymany of its policies.NGO activists have joined the
overzealous NGO's) - multinationals engage inarmed - though mostly peaceful - rebels of the
preemptive sacking. More than 50,000 children inChiapas region in Mexico. Norwegian NGO's sent
Bangladesh were let go in 1993 by German garmentmembers to forcibly board whaling ships. In the USA,
factories in anticipation of the Americananti-abortion activists have murdered doctors. In
never-legislated Child Labor Deterrence Act.FormerBritain, animal rights zealots have both assassinated
Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich, observed:"Stoppingexperimental scientists and wrecked property.Birth
child labor without doing anything else could leavecontrol NGO's carry out mass sterilizations in poor
children worse off. If they are working out ofcountries, financed by rich country governments in a
necessity, as most are, stopping them could forcebid to stem immigration. NGO's buy slaves in Sudan
them into prostitution or other employment withthus encouraging the practice of slave hunting
greater personal dangers. The most important thing isthroughout sub-Saharan Africa. Other NGO's actively
that they be in school and receive the education tocollaborate with "rebel" armies - a euphemism for
help them leave poverty."NGO-fostered hypeterrorists.NGO's lack a synoptic view and their work
notwithstanding, 70% of all children work within theiroften undermines efforts by international
family unit, in agriculture. Less than 1 percent areorganizations such as the UNHCR and by
employed in mining and another 2 percent ingovernments. Poorly-paid local officials have to
construction. Again contrary to NGO-profferedcontend with crumbling budgets as the funds are
panaceas, education is not a solution. Millions graduatediverted to rich expatriates doing the same job for a
every year in developing countries - 100,000 inmultiple of the cost and with inexhaustible hubris.This
Morocco alone. But unemployment reaches more thanis not conducive to happy co-existence between
one third of the workforce in places such asforeign do-gooders and indigenous governments.
Macedonia.Children at work may be harshly treatedSometimes NGO's seem to be an ingenious ploy to
by their supervisors but at least they are kept offsolve Western unemployment at the expense of
the far more menacing streets. Some kids even enddown-trodden natives. This is a misperception driven
up with a skill and are rendered employable."Theby envy and avarice.But it is still powerful enough to
Economist" sums up the shortsightedness, inaptitude,foster resentment and worse. NGO's are on the
ignorance, and self-centeredness of NGO'sverge of provoking a ruinous backlash against them in
neatly:"Suppose that in the remorseless search fortheir countries of destination. That would be a pity.
profit, multinationals pay sweatshop wages to theirSome of them are doing indispensable work. If only
workers in developing countries. Regulation forcingthey were a wee more sensitive and somewhat less
them to pay higher wages is demanded... The NGOs,ostentatious. But then they wouldn't be NGO's, would
the reformed multinationals and enlightenedthey?
rich-country governments propose tough rules on