Take a trip to Okanagan Valley


The Self-Appointed Altruists

Their arrival portends rising local pricesto pay higher wages is demanded... The NGOs,
and a culture shock. Many of them live inthe reformed multinationals and enlightened
plush apartments, or five star hotels, driverich-country governments propose tough rules
SUV's, sport $3000 laptops and PDA's. Theyon third-world factory wages, backed up by
earn a two figure multiple of the localtrade barriers to keep out imports from
average wage. They are busybodies, preachers,countries that do not comply. Shoppers in the
critics, do-gooders, and professionalWest pay more - but willingly, because they
altruists.Always self-appointed, they answerknow it is in a good cause. The NGOs declare
to no constituency. Though unelected andanother victory. The companies, having
ignorant of local realities, they confrontshafted their third-world competition and
the democratically chosen and those who votedprotected their domestic markets, count their
them into office. A few of them are enmeshedbigger profits (higher wage costs
in crime and corruption. They are thenotwithstanding). And the third-world workers
non-governmental organizations, or NGO's.Somedisplaced from locally owned factories
NGO's - like Oxfam, Human Rights Watch,explain to their children why the West's new
Medecins Sans Frontieres, or Amnesty -deal for the victims of capitalism requires
genuinely contribute to enhancing welfare, tothem to starve."NGO's in places like Sudan,
the mitigation of hunger, the furtherance ofSomalia, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Pakistan,
human and civil rights, or the curbing ofAlbania, and Zimbabwe have become the
disease. Others - usually in the guise ofpreferred venue for Western aid - both
think tanks and lobby groups - are sometimeshumanitarian and financial - development
ideologically biased, orfinancing, and emergency relief. According to
religiously-committed and, often, at thethe Red Cross, more money goes through NGO's
service of special interests.NGO's - such asthan through the World Bank. Their iron grip
the International Crisis Group - have openlyon food, medicine, and funds rendered them an
interfered on behalf of the opposition in thealternative government - sometimes as venal
recent elections in Macedonia. Other NGO'sand graft-stricken as the one they
have done so in Belarus and Ukraine, Zimbabwereplace.Local businessmen, politicians,
and Israel, Nigeria and Thailand, Slovakiaacademics, and even journalists form NGO's to
and Hungary - and even in Western, rich,plug into the avalanche of Western largesse.
countries including the USA, Canada, Germany,In the process, they award themselves and
and Belgium.The encroachment on statetheir relatives with salaries, perks, and
sovereignty of international law - enshrinedpreferred access to Western goods and
in numerous treaties and conventions - allowscredits. NGO's have evolved into vast
NGO's to get involved in hitherto strictlynetworks of patronage in Africa, Latin
domestic affairs like corruption, civilAmerica, and Asia.NGO's chase disasters with
rights, the composition of the media, thea relish. More than 200 of them opened shop
penal and civil codes, environmentalin the aftermath of the Kosovo refugee crisis
policies, or the allocation of economicin 1999-2000. Another 50 supplanted them
resources and of natural endowments, such asduring the civil unrest in Macedonia a year
land and water. No field of governmentlater. Floods, elections, earthquakes, wars -
activity is now exempt from the glare ofconstitute the cornucopia that feed the
NGO's. They serve as self-appointedNGO's.NGO's are proponents of Western values
witnesses, judges, jury and executioner- women's lib, human rights, civil rights,
rolled into one.Regardless of theirthe protection of minorities, freedom,
persuasion or modus operandi, all NGO's areequality. Not everyone finds this liberal
top heavy with entrenched, well-remunerated,menu palatable. The arrival of NGO's often
extravagantly-perked bureaucracies. Opacityprovokes social polarization and cultural
is typical of NGO's. Amnesty's rules preventclashes. Traditionalists in Bangladesh,
its officials from publicly discussing thenationalists in Macedonia, religious zealots
inner workings of the organization -in Israel, security forces everywhere, and
proposals, debates, opinions - until theyalmost all politicians find NGO's irritating
have become officially voted into itsand bothersome.The British government ploughs
Mandate. Thus, dissenting views rarely get anwell over $30 million a year into "Proshika",
open hearing.Contrary to their teachings, thea Bangladeshi NGO. It started as a women's
financing of NGO's is invariably obscure andeducation outfit and ended up as a restive
their sponsors unknown. The bulk of theand aggressive women empowerment political
income of most non-governmentallobby group with budgets to rival many
organizations, even the largest ones, comesministries in this impoverished, Moslem and
from - usually foreign - powers. Many NGO'spatriarchal country.Other NGO's - fuelled by
serve as official contractors for$300 million of annual foreign infusion -
governments.NGO's serve as long arms of theirevolved from humble origins to become mighty
sponsoring states - gathering intelligence,coalitions of full-time activists. NGO's like
burnishing their image, and promoting theirthe Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee
interests. There is a revolving door between(BRAC) and the Association for Social
the staff of NGO's and governmentAdvancement mushroomed even as their agendas
bureaucracies the world over. The Britishhave been fully implemented and their goals
Foreign Office finances a host of NGO's -exceeded. It now owns and operates 30,000
including the fiercely "independent" Globalschools.This mission creep is not unique to
Witness - in troubled spots, such as Angola.developing countries. As Parkinson discerned,
Many host governments accuse NGO's of -organizations tend to self-perpetuate
unwittingly or knowingly - serving as hotbedsregardless of their proclaimed charter.
of espionage.Very few NGO's derive some ofRemember NATO? Human rights organizations,
their income from public contributions andlike Amnesty, are now attempting to
donations. The more substantial NGO's spendincorporate in their ever-expanding remit
one tenth of their budget on PR and"economic and social rights" - such as the
solicitation of charity. In a desperate bidrights to food, housing, fair wages, potable
to attract international attention, so manywater, sanitation, and health provision. How
of them lied about their projects in theinsolvent countries are supposed to provide
Rwanda crisis in 1994, recounts "Thesuch munificence is conveniently
Economist", that the Red Cross felt compelledoverlooked."The Economist" reviewed a few of
to draw up a ten point mandatory NGO code ofthe more egregious cases of NGO
ethics. A code of conduct was adopted inimperialism.Human Rights Watch lately offered
1995. But the phenomenon recurred inthis tortured argument in favor of expanding
Kosovo.All NGO's claim to be not for profit -the role of human rights NGO's: "The best way
yet, many of them possess sizable equityto prevent famine today is to secure the
portfolios and abuse their position toright to free expression - so that misguided
increase the market share of firms they own.government policies can be brought to public
Conflicts of interest and unethical behaviorattention and corrected before food shortages
abound.Cafedirect is a British firm committedbecome acute." It blatantly ignored the fact
to "fair trade" coffee. Oxfam, an NGO,that respect for human and political rights
embarked on a campaign targeted atdoes not fend off natural disasters and
Cafedirect's competitors, accusing them ofdisease. The two countries with the highest
exploiting growers by paying them a tinyincidence of AIDS are Africa's only two true
fraction of the retail price of the coffeedemocracies - Botswana and South Africa.The
they sell. Yet, Oxfam owns 25% ofCentre for Economic and Social Rights, an
Cafedirect.Large NGO's resemble multinationalAmerican outfit, "challenges economic
corporations in structure and operation. Theyinjustice as a violation of international
are hierarchical, maintain large media,human rights law". Oxfam pledges to support
government lobbying, and PR departments,the "rights to a sustainable livelihood, and
head-hunt, invest proceeds inthe rights and capacities to participate in
professionally-managed portfolios, compete insocieties and make positive changes to
government tenders, and own a variety ofpeople's lives". In a poor attempt at
unrelated businesses. The Aga Khan Fund foremulation, the WHO published an inanely
Economic Development owns the license fortitled document - "A Human Rights Approach to
second mobile phone operator in Afghanistan -Tuberculosis".NGO's are becoming not only
among other businesses. In this respect,all-pervasive but more aggressive. In their
NGO's are more like cults than like civiccapacity as "shareholder activists", they
organizations.Many NGO's promote economicdisrupt shareholders meetings and act to
causes - anti-globalization, the banning ofactively tarnish corporate and individual
child labor, the relaxing of intellectualreputations. Friends of the Earth worked hard
property rights, or fair payment forlast year to instigate a consumer boycott
agricultural products. Many of these causesagainst Exxon Mobil - for not investing in
are both worthy and sound. Alas, most NGO'srenewable energy resources and for ignoring
lack economic expertise and inflict damage onglobal warming. No one - including other
the alleged recipients of their beneficence.shareholders - understood their demands. But
NGO's are at times manipulated by - orit went down well with the media, with a few
collude with - industrial groups andcelebrities, and with contributors.As "think
political parties.It is telling that thetanks", NGO's issue partisan and biased
denizens of many developing countries suspectreports. The International Crisis Group
the West and its NGO's of promoting an agendapublished a rabid attack on the then
of trade protectionism. Stringent - andincumbent government of Macedonia, days
expensive - labor and environmentalbefore an election, relegating the rampant
provisions in international treaties may wellcorruption of its predecessors - whom it
be a ploy to fend off imports based on cheapseemed to be tacitly supporting - to a few
labor and the competition they wreak onfootnotes. On at least two occasions - in its
well-ensconced domestic industries and theirreports regarding Bosnia and Zimbabwe - ICG
political stooges.Take child labor - ashas recommended confrontation, the imposition
distinct from the universally condemnableof sanctions, and, if all else fails, the use
phenomena of child prostitution, childof force. Though the most vocal and visible,
soldiering, or child slavery.Child labor, init is far from being the only NGO that
many destitute locales, is all that separatesadvocates "just" wars.The ICG is a repository
the family from all-pervasive, lifeof former heads of state and has-been
threatening, poverty. As national incomepoliticians and is renowned (and notorious)
grows, child labor declines. Following thefor its prescriptive - some say meddlesome -
outcry provoked, in 1995, by NGO's againstphilosophy and tactics. "The Economist"
soccer balls stitched by children inremarked sardonically: "To say (that ICG) is
Pakistan, both Nike and Reebok relocated'solving world crises' is to risk
their workshops and sacked countless womenunderestimating its ambitions, if
and 7000 children. The average family incomeoverestimating its achievements."NGO's have
- anyhow meager - fell by 20 percent.Thisorchestrated the violent showdown during the
affair elicited the following wry commentarytrade talks in Seattle in 1999 and its repeat
from economists Drusilla Brown, Alanperformances throughout the world. The World
Deardorif, and Robert Stern:"While BadenBank was so intimidated by the riotous
Sports can quite credibly claim that theirinvasion of its premises in the
soccer balls are not sewn by children, theNGO-choreographed "Fifty Years is Enough"
relocation of their production facilitycampaign of 1994, that it now employs dozens
undoubtedly did nothing for their formerof NGO activists and let NGO's determine many
child workers and their families."This is farof its policies.NGO activists have joined the
from being a unique case. Threatened witharmed - though mostly peaceful - rebels of
legal reprisals and "reputation risks" (beingthe Chiapas region in Mexico. Norwegian NGO's
named-and-shamed by overzealous NGO's) -sent members to forcibly board whaling ships.
multinationals engage in preemptive sacking.In the USA, anti-abortion activists have
More than 50,000 children in Bangladesh weremurdered doctors. In Britain, animal rights
let go in 1993 by German garment factories inzealots have both assassinated experimental
anticipation of the American never-legislatedscientists and wrecked property.Birth control
Child Labor Deterrence Act.Former SecretaryNGO's carry out mass sterilizations in poor
of Labor, Robert Reich, observed:"Stoppingcountries, financed by rich country
child labor without doing anything else couldgovernments in a bid to stem immigration.
leave children worse off. If they are workingNGO's buy slaves in Sudan thus encouraging
out of necessity, as most are, stopping themthe practice of slave hunting throughout
could force them into prostitution or othersub-Saharan Africa. Other NGO's actively
employment with greater personal dangers. Thecollaborate with "rebel" armies - a euphemism
most important thing is that they be infor terrorists.NGO's lack a synoptic view and
school and receive the education to help themtheir work often undermines efforts by
leave poverty."NGO-fostered hypeinternational organizations such as the UNHCR
notwithstanding, 70% of all children workand by governments. Poorly-paid local
within their family unit, in agriculture.officials have to contend with crumbling
Less than 1 percent are employed in miningbudgets as the funds are diverted to rich
and another 2 percent in construction. Againexpatriates doing the same job for a multiple
contrary to NGO-proffered panaceas, educationof the cost and with inexhaustible
is not a solution. Millions graduate everyhubris.This is not conducive to happy
year in developing countries - 100,000 inco-existence between foreign do-gooders and
Morocco alone. But unemployment reaches moreindigenous governments. Sometimes NGO's seem
than one third of the workforce in placesto be an ingenious ploy to solve Western
such as Macedonia.Children at work may beunemployment at the expense of down-trodden
harshly treated by their supervisors but atnatives. This is a misperception driven by
least they are kept off the far more menacingenvy and avarice.But it is still powerful
streets. Some kids even end up with a skillenough to foster resentment and worse. NGO's
and are rendered employable."The Economist"are on the verge of provoking a ruinous
sums up the shortsightedness, inaptitude,backlash against them in their countries of
ignorance, and self-centeredness of NGO'sdestination. That would be a pity. Some of
neatly:"Suppose that in the remorselessthem are doing indispensable work. If only
search for profit, multinationals paythey were a wee more sensitive and somewhat
sweatshop wages to their workers inless ostentatious. But then they wouldn't be
developing countries. Regulation forcing themNGO's, would they?



1 A B C D E 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117